How to Perform Manager Evaluations

In the realm of effective leadership and organisational growth, performing manager evaluations is a critical practice. This article explains more.

These evaluations serve as a powerful tool for assessing the performance of managers. But how exactly should organisations approach the process of manager evaluations? What steps should organisations take to ensure fairness, accuracy, and meaningful outcomes?


Manager evaluations play a pivotal role in the growth of an organisation. These evaluations serve as a means to assess the performance of employees, offering valuable insights into their strengths and areas for improvement. By providing specific feedback and highlighting accomplishments, managers can recognise and reinforce positive behaviours, boosting employee morale and motivation.


Moreover, these assessments enable managers to identify high-potential employees who may be ready for additional responsibilities or promotion, fostering a culture of meritocracy within the organisation.


In this article, we will explore the essential steps, considerations, and techniques to perform manager evaluations that lead to improved performance, enhanced leadership, and a thriving organisational culture.

Improve your employee engagement

Improve your employee engagement in less than two minutes

Get started for free today.

Free sign up

Importance of manager evaluations

Manager evaluations are essential for several reasons. First and foremost, they allow organisations to assess the performance of their managers objectively. Through evaluating their competencies, behaviours, and achievements, organisations can identify areas where managers excel and areas where improvement is needed.


Manager evaluations help in making important decisions regarding promotions, compensation, and development opportunities. By having a clear understanding of a manager’s performance, organisations can make informed decisions about career progression and rewards.


Additionally, effective manager evaluations contribute to the overall organisational culture of continuous improvement, accountability, and transparency.

Defining manager evaluation criteria and setting goals

The first step in conducting effective manager evaluations is to define clear evaluation criteria and set specific goals. Evaluation criteria should align with the organisation’s values, objectives, and expectations from managers.

These criteria may include:


  • Leadership qualities;
  • Communication skills;
  • Decision-making abilities;
  • Team building, and;
  • Goal attainment.


In addition, setting specific goals for each manager helps create a roadmap for their professional development. These goals should be challenging yet attainable, motivating managers to strive for excellence and continuously improve their skills and capabilities.


By defining evaluation criteria and setting goals, organisations can ensure that their manager evaluations are focused, objective, and conducive to professional growth.

Collecting feedback from various sources

To gain a comprehensive understanding of a manager’s performance, you should collect feedback from various sources. These sources may include direct reports, peers, colleagues from other departments, and senior leaders. An anonymous and confidential feedback process is crucial to encourage honest and unbiased responses.


You can gather feedback through surveys, interviews, or a combination of both. It is essential to ask specific questions related to the manager’s performance, strengths, areas for improvement, and their impact on the team and organisation.

Working on fixing workload management

In addition to feedback from other sources, it is essential to prioritise the feedback of the managers themselves. Managers are in a unique position to provide insights into their workload, challenges, and how they are managing their responsibilities. During the evaluation process, engaging in open conversations with managers about their workload can uncover potential issues such as overburdening or inefficiencies in task allocation.


If it becomes evident from their feedback and evaluation that managers are facing a high workload, organisations can consider international hiring to assist them. By delegating tasks and responsibilities, organisations can ensure that managers are not overwhelmed and that the workload is appropriately distributed.


This approach helps maintain productivity, rebuild team morale, prevent burnout, and ensure that everyone completes all the work on time. It is crucial to regularly assess the workload of managers and make necessary adjustments to optimise their effectiveness.

Evaluating performance

Once feedback has been collected from multiple sources, including the managers too, it is time to evaluate the manager’s performance based on the defined criteria and goals. You should conduct evaluations objectively, taking into account both quantitative and qualitative feedback. There are various approaches you can follow when evaluating performance.

Providing written feedback to managers

Providing written feedback is an important aspect of the evaluation process. Written feedback should be specific, constructive, and focused on strengths as well as areas for improvement. It should highlight achievements, acknowledge efforts, and provide actionable recommendations for growth and development. It is also important to present that feedback in a professional and respectful manner.

Conducting face-to-face meetings

Following the written feedback, it is crucial to schedule face-to-face meetings with the managers to discuss the evaluation results. You should conduct these meetings in a supportive and constructive manner, emphasising open communication and active listening.


Give the managers an opportunity to share their perspectives, provide additional insights, and ask questions. The purpose of these meetings is to provide clarity, address any concerns, and collaboratively develop a plan for professional growth and development.

Creating development plans

Creating development plans is an integral part of the manager evaluation process. These plans should outline specific actions, resources, and timelines for achieving the identified goals. They may include attending training programmes, mentoring opportunities, job rotations, or special projects. It is essential to ensure that the development plans are tailored to the individual needs and aspirations of each manager.

Tracking progress

Once the development plans are in place, it is important to establish a system for tracking progress and providing ongoing support. Schedule regular check-ins, performance discussions, and feedback sessions to monitor the manager’s progress towards their goals. These discussions should provide an opportunity to address any challenges, celebrate achievements, and make necessary adjustments to the development plans.

Confidentiality, fairness, and constructive feedback during the  process

Implementing practices that promote transparency, growth, and accountability helps to establish a manager evaluation process that not only assesses performance but also fosters professional development, cultivates a culture of continuous improvement, and drives organisational success. Organisations can establish a robust manager evaluation process that promotes a culture of transparency and accountability by implementing several key practices.


Confidentiality is paramount in the manager evaluation process. You should treat the feedback you’ve collected with the utmost confidentiality, ensuring that the anonymity of respondents is maintained. This encourages honest and open feedback, fostering a culture of trust within the organisation.


Fairness is another critical aspect of manager evaluations. Evaluation criteria should be applied consistently to all managers, without any bias or favouritism. The organisation should train evaluators to assess performance objectively and avoid personal biases or preconceived notions.

Constructive feedback

Constructive feedback is essential for the growth and development of managers. Feedback should be specific, actionable, and focused on behaviours and performance rather than personal traits. It should aim to motivate and inspire managers to improve, providing them with the necessary guidance and support.

Addressing common challenges in manager evaluations

Manager evaluations can face certain challenges that organisations need to address for a successful process. Common challenges in manager evaluations include:

Subjective evaluations

One common challenge is the subjectivity of evaluations. Evaluators may have different interpretations of the evaluation criteria, leading to inconsistencies in ratings. To overcome this challenge, organisations can provide clear guidelines and training to evaluators, ensuring they have a shared understanding of the criteria and standards.

Biassed feedback collection

Another challenge is the potential bias in feedback collection. Biases can arise from personal relationships, implicit biases, or reluctance to provide honest feedback. To mitigate this, organisations can encourage anonymous feedback and provide multiple channels for feedback collection. Training on unconscious bias can also help evaluators in recognising and minimising bias in their assessments.

Improper documentation

Proper documentation of manager evaluations is crucial but can be challenging. Inadequate documentation may result in a lack of clarity regarding past performance, hindering accurate assessments and comparisons over time.


Organisations can address this challenge by implementing a standardised evaluation process that includes thorough documentation of performance feedback, accomplishments, and areas for improvement. This ensures a comprehensive record that aids in tracking progress and making informed decisions.

Inconsistent follow-up and action plans

Following up on evaluations and creating actionable plans for improvement is essential for the growth and development of managers. However, organisations often face challenges in ensuring consistent follow-up and implementation of action plans.


To overcome this, organisations should prioritise ongoing communication and support, providing managers with the necessary resources and guidance to address identified areas for improvement. Regular check-ins and performance discussions can help keep evaluations relevant and facilitate the progress of managers towards their goals.

Strategies for continuous improvement

Continuous improvement is an ongoing effort in manager evaluations. Strategies for continuous improvement in manager evaluations are essential to ensure that the evaluation process remains effective, relevant, and aligned with the evolving needs and expectations of the organisation and its managers. Organisations can adopt several strategies to achieve this goal.

Conduct regular evaluations

One strategy is to conduct regular evaluations of the evaluation process itself. Gather feedback from participants, evaluate the effectiveness of the criteria and methods used, and identify areas for improvement. This feedback-driven approach helps refine the process and adapt to changing needs.

Benchmarking against industry

Benchmarking against industry best practices is another effective strategy. Stay informed about the latest trends and research in performance management and learn from other organisations’ successful approaches. This external perspective can provide valuable insights and innovative ideas.

Investing in technology solutions

Investing in technology solutions can streamline and optimise the evaluation process. Explore performance management software that automates data collection, simplifies feedback gathering, and provides robust reporting capabilities. These tools can save time, improve accuracy, and enhance the overall efficiency of the evaluation process.

Encouraging feedback

Encouraging a culture of continuous feedback and development is vital. Promote ongoing conversations between managers and their direct reports, enabling regular check-ins and discussions about goals, progress, and expectations.


Regularly soliciting feedback from managers, evaluators, and other stakeholders can provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the evaluation process. You can collect this feedback through surveys, focus groups, or one-on-one discussions. By actively seeking feedback, organisations can identify areas for improvement and make necessary adjustments.

Providing ongoing training

Providing ongoing training and development opportunities for evaluators can enhance the quality and consistency of evaluations. Training can focus on effective feedback delivery, reducing bias, and improving evaluation skills. Additionally, sharing best practices and lessons learned within the organisation can foster a culture of continuous improvement.

Best practises for manager evaluations

To ensure the effectiveness of manager evaluations, organisations can adopt best practices that enhance the overall process. The following are some of the practices you can use:

Communication and transparency are key

Clearly communicate the purpose, expectations, and timelines of the evaluation process to managers and evaluators. This helps create a shared understanding and promotes trust. This transparency sets the stage for open and constructive dialogue.

Involving multiple perspectives

Seeking feedback from a diverse range of sources, including direct reports, peers, and colleagues from different departments, offers valuable insights into different aspects of a manager’s role. This well-rounded perspective helps in forming a more accurate assessment and ensures that the evaluation captures a holistic picture of the manager’s performance.

Regularly reviewing and updating evaluation criteria is essential

As organisational goals and priorities change, the evaluation criteria should reflect these shifts. Engaging stakeholders in the process of refining and updating the evaluation criteria ensures that they remain relevant and aligned with the organisation’s current objectives. This adaptability allows the evaluation process to stay in line with the organisation’s dynamic nature.

Training managers on self-assessment can be valuable

Encouraging managers to reflect on their own performance and provide input during the evaluation process fosters a sense of accountability and personal growth. By promoting self-awareness, managers are more likely to take ownership of their development and actively work towards improving their skills and effectiveness.

Recognise and reward good work

Recognition and reward for high-performing managers should be part of the evaluation process. Acknowledge and celebrate good managers who consistently exceed expectations and demonstrate exceptional leadership. This reinforces positive behaviours and motivates managers to continue their professional development.

In summary

Unlocking the potential of managers is the key to unlocking organisational success. By implementing an effective and comprehensive manager evaluation process, organisations can assess performance, foster growth, and cultivate a culture of excellence. Through clear communication, diverse perspectives, regular review of criteria, self-assessment, recognition, and ongoing support, organisations can empower their managers to reach new heights. Remember, confidentiality, fairness, and constructive feedback are the pillars that underpin this process, ensuring that managers thrive and contribute to the collective success of the organisation. So, embrace the power of manager evaluations and embark on a journey of professional growth and organisational prosperity.

About the Author

Rosalia Blanchette is a Global HR Consultant with extensive experience in providing strategic guidance and solutions to multinational organizations. With a strong background in human resources management, talent acquisition, and employee development, she has helped companies optimize their HR practices to drive organizational success.

Team 6Q

Team 6Q